TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of sovereign credit ratings on systemic risk and the moderating role of regulatory reforms
T2 - An international investigation
AU - Sahibzada, Irfan Ullah
AU - Rizwan, Muhammad Suhail
AU - Qureshi, Anum
N1 - Funding Information:
We are thankful to Dr. Dawood Ashraf and Dr. Ghufran Ahmad for their helpful comments and suggestions on initial drafts of the paper. We are also thankful to Prof. Carol Alexander (Managing Editor), Associate Editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions that enabled us to improve the quality of this paper considerably. We would also like to acknowledge the NBS Datalytics Lab for computational support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/8/28
Y1 - 2022/8/28
N2 - This paper investigates the association between systemic risk and sovereign credit ratings issued by the three credit rating agencies (CRAs), i.e., Moody's, S&P, and Fitch, for 65 countries from Jan-2000 to Dec-2020. Results show that a positive (negative) sovereign rating action (SRA) is associated with a significant decline (increase) in the systemic risk. However, variations exist among the three CRAs as Moody's actions are associated with a larger impact, followed by S&P and Fitch. Furthermore, results show an asymmetric response of systemic risk towards negative rating signals. Analyzing the effect of regulatory reforms to reduce the shock element in the announcement of sovereign rating signals provides mixed results. After the regulatory reforms, only S&P's overall rating actions impact the systemic risk, but the asymmetrical response persists for all CRAs. These results have certain policy implications for regulators, bank managers, and other stakeholders of financial systems.
AB - This paper investigates the association between systemic risk and sovereign credit ratings issued by the three credit rating agencies (CRAs), i.e., Moody's, S&P, and Fitch, for 65 countries from Jan-2000 to Dec-2020. Results show that a positive (negative) sovereign rating action (SRA) is associated with a significant decline (increase) in the systemic risk. However, variations exist among the three CRAs as Moody's actions are associated with a larger impact, followed by S&P and Fitch. Furthermore, results show an asymmetric response of systemic risk towards negative rating signals. Analyzing the effect of regulatory reforms to reduce the shock element in the announcement of sovereign rating signals provides mixed results. After the regulatory reforms, only S&P's overall rating actions impact the systemic risk, but the asymmetrical response persists for all CRAs. These results have certain policy implications for regulators, bank managers, and other stakeholders of financial systems.
KW - Credit rating agencies
KW - Regulatory reforms
KW - Sovereign ratings
KW - Systemic risk
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137293473#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106654
DO - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106654
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137293473
SN - 0378-4266
VL - 145
JO - Journal of Banking and Finance
JF - Journal of Banking and Finance
M1 - 106654
ER -